Truth in Management and Power Relationships Essay Example for Free

Truth in Management and Power Relationships Essay Since the beginning, logicians have concocted their forms of the genuine definition for ‘truth’. The Greek logician Aristotle had clarified truth as â€Å"To state of what is that it isn't, or of what isn't that it is, is bogus, while to state of what is that it is, and of what isn't that it isn't, is true† [1]. Aristotle clarifies that fact can be depicted as that something that is clear and unmistakable in its own structure, nature or character. Another Greek critic and rationalist Protagoras held the view that â€Å"man is the proportion of all things, of things that will be that they are, and of things that are not that they are not†[2]. As per him, each person’s assessment of truth is based their own impression of truth. In the acclaimed Greek writer Homer’s epic Odyssey, there is one example when the Greek legend Odysseus didn't really uncover reality when he says â€Å"I will reveal to all of you the truth†[3]. In his stories, there are characters that keep down data or lie. In the current day the executives, we must be careful with respect to how we approach coming clean to our subordinates or partners. There are various situations that we need to consider before uncovering reality. Once in a while, we may wind up in circumstances whereby we need to conceal reality to ensure our uprightness and position in the organization or association. Socrates, an Athenian Greek Philosopher once cited: â€Å"You, old buddy, would you say you are not embarrassed about stacking up the best measure of cash and respect and notoriety, and thinking so minimal about intelligence and truth and the best improvement of yourself which you never respect or regard? [2]† We can identify with his statement in today’s quick paced occasions, when in the mission for influence, riches and notoriety, we will in general overlook our exceptionally essential temperances of being upright and honest. I can cite a case of my own experience while working in a semiconductor organization where my administrator and partner were from Philippines. I used to have reservations at first in opening up to my associates and afterward as the months passed, I began trusting with my Filipino partner in regards to two or three issues I had with the organization the board style and incredibly long working hours. He afterward sold out the confidence that I had in him when he gave all the grievances over to my boss despite my good faith. From that point forward, the organization the executives began to overlook my sources of info and began giving me opposing eyes at each gathering. The exercise we can gain from that was to guarantee that specific realities anyway unwieldy they might be to heft around, we need to guarantee that they remain concealed away because of the intensity and absence of trust among workers in today’s the board. The Greek thinker Plato once said â€Å"You ought not respect men more than truth[4]† however in today’s universe of the executives, the key territories of yield and execution are esteemed more profoundly than the honest standards at work. Force connections assume a significant job in the executives in the current day. These connections have taken on an exceptionally forceful measurement these days with the current harvest of intensity hungry administrators. As I would see it, we have to fabricate such associations with our partners just as our bosses to initially support ourselves for the since quite a while ago run and afterward to guarantee that we keep up a consistent advancement all through our professions. From my own understanding while at the same time working with my past manager, I used to see that my group comprised of predominantly Filipinos, Indians, Malaysians and Chinese. They used to separate into their individual nationality gatherings and remain together consistently while accomplishing work and used to give help and valuable exhortation just to their compatriots when out of luck. Those gatherings continued evaluating negative authoritative governmental issues against one another to guarantee that none of them could develop in the organization in order to achieve by and large force. The authoritative legislative issues at my organization even went upto the higher administration where in the advancements were committed uniquely to their individual comrades and did not depend on capacity or execution. The higher administration even had outright control of the human asset (HR) office whereby the employing of new staff was organized dependent on nationality of the employing chief or director as opposed to offering need to the capability and experience of the newcomers. Citing from Plato, â€Å"The proportion of a man is the thing that he does with power[4]†, in the executives terms, his words connote that a genuine capacity of a director must be dictated by how he uses his capacity successfully with regards to an authoritative situation. The Greek Philosopher Socrates had once stated: â€Å"Esteemed companion, resident of Athens, the best city on the planet, so exceptional in both insight and influence, arent you embarrassed to mind such a great amount to make all the cash you can, and to propel your notoriety and prestigewhile for truth and shrewdness and the improvement of your spirit you have no consideration or worry[2]†. This citation is well-suited in portraying the voracious requirement for riches among the Athenians in those days for picking up notoriety and glory at the expense of their virtues like truth and intelligence. Socrates’ words can even be applied concerning today’s the board style. In the current occasions, considering the aftermath from the monetary emergency and its effect on the associations, directors get significantly increasingly hesitant to follow the honest philosophies and rather firmly take part in fortifying their capacity associations with other various leveled individuals inside their associations to set up a solid decent footing for themselves in the business. References: 1. Owens, J., Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics. third ed1978, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies. 2. Spillane, R. , An Eye For An I: Living Philosophy2007, Melbourne: Michelle Anderson Publishing. 3. Thiselton, A. C. , The New universal word reference of New Testament religious philosophy, ed. B. Colin. Vol. 3. 1978, Exeter: Paternoster Press. 4. Stavropoulos, S. , The Beginning of All Wisdom: Timeless Advice from the Ancient Greeks. first ed2003: Da Capo Press.

School Bullying in California Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

School Bullying in California - Research Paper Example Current approach Jigsaw Classroom This is an agreeable learning method with a multi decade track record of diminishing racial clash and expanding positive training results. In this system simply like in the jigsaw puzzle, each student’s part is basic. For instance, understudies in a history class are partitioned in to might be five gatherings and the errand being to find out about World War 2. In one jigsaw bunch John can be dependable in looking into about the ascent to intensity of Adolf Hitler, May relegated to cover inhumane imprisonments, Alex to cover Britain’s job in the war, Mike to investigate on the commitment of the Soviet Union. In the end each understudy returns to his jigsaw gathering and will attempt to introduce an efficient report to the gathering. In this manner if a part doesn't care for the other he can't excel on the test that follows (Barrows, 1998). This in this way energizes tuning in, commitment and sympathy by giving everybody a basic part to p lay in the scholastic movement. Arrangement Makers Metro Center offers specialized help that uses counsel strategies which constructs solid customer conference relationtionship that bring about continued change and improvement. In this way area and school agents play a functioning job in coming to comprehend and survey their own interests as opposed to depending exclusively on the information and aptitudes outside specialists.

Waitlist Consideration at SIPA COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

Waitlist Consideration at SIPA COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog I have been meaning to shed some light upon how waitlist process is handled by the Admissions Committee SIPA.   I will start off by saying that the process of considering applicants placed on the waitlist can possibly best be described as “organic.” What I mean by this is that the process of making waitlist offers does not follow a strict format or specific timeline.   Rather, it is a process that has a life of its own due to the fact that availability of seats in the fall class once initial admission offer are sent out is dependent upon factors over which the Committee largely has no control. To provide some background, this year we have given admitted applicants until April 20th to respond to their offer of admission.   Some admitted applicants have already paid enrollment deposits, however past history shows that the vast majority waits until the very last minute.   Thus we will not have a clear picture of responses for another week or so.   Once the enrollment deposit deadline passes the picture becomes clearer, but the picture is subject to constant change over the summer. In past years we have made offers of admission to select candidates on the waitlist as early as April and as late as August.   The reason I describe the process as organic is that we never know when a candidate who has paid a deposit will contact us and let us know that circumstances have changed in a way that will not allow them to enroll. For example, international students sometimes face the unique challenge of trying to complete government paperwork for a Visa.   This process does not always go smoothly and late in the summer we may be notified by a candidate that the paperwork will not be completed on time, thus opening a seat in the fall class.   We have no way to predict this, but with such a large number of international applicants it is not uncommon for this to happen. For other applicants, something unexpected happens and they contact us to let us know they will not be able to enroll and will thus forfeit their seat.   The Admissions Committee obviously has no way of predicting such circumstances. So part one of the waitlist story deals with uncertain circumstance and part two of the story is process.   When we are able to make an offer to candidates on the waitlist, how does the process work? If you are on the waitlist you know that we ask you to fill out a form indicating your interest in remaining on the waitlist.   The vast majority return this form indicating that they do wish to remain on the waitlist, but just like circumstances with admitted applicants change, so do circumstances with waitlist candidates change. Once the enrollment deposit deadline for admitted applicants passes (April 20th) every few weeks the Admissions Committee will meet to evaluate fall enrollment.   After these meetings I will send out emails to those who have chosen to remain on the waitlist providing them with an update.   At a minimum I try to send out one email per month. If spaces are available how are waitlist candidates chosen?   Again it is an organic process.   We do not have number rankings for the waitlist and the size of the waitlist changes over time as candidates notify us that they no longer wish to be considered. When it comes time to consider candidates from the waitlist, files are read once again.   Although a “full read” might not be necessary, Committee members will review reader comment sheets and pay particular attention to areas of concern that were noted during the first review.   As the reading is done, we get a feel for the overall landscape of those on the waitlist and make decisions. Candidates offered admission from the waitlist receive an email from our office indicating that the decision is available on the application Web site.   Those not offered admission remain on the waitlist and continue to get email updates. I realize the process of waiting is not easy.   We will do our best to keep those on the waitlist updated, but as you can see, the process does not give us the ability to provide specific answers at specific times.   In summary, if you have chosen to remain on the waitlist we will contact you intermittently with updates, along with asking if you wish to remain on the waitlist.   The Committee will read files of those on the waitlist “as is” â€" meaning we will not accept additional documents or information for consideration.   Our first update will likely go out before the end of April. Please also note that SIPA is unable to award fellowship funding to those admitted from the waitlist.   U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents can qualify for Federal and possibly State based aid, but SIPA funding has already been allocated.   I would advise both domestic and international students to review the financial aid information on our Web site so that if we are able to make an offer, you are prepared to complete the appropriate paperwork.